Archive for September, 2007

Fall Goodness

Thursday, September 27th, 2007

With October knocking on our door, it’s the time of year when our food cravings change from salads to soups. It can be challenging for restaurants to incorporate good nutrition into comfort food that sustain us in the fall. And yet, the yearning for healthy foods (albeit tasty and comforting too) doesn’t stop.

Here are a few quick bites to incorporate into your fall menus:

  • Opt for whole grains, rather than nutritionally empty refined grains. Easy whole grains to add include brown rice, oats and whole wheat into your menu items.
  • Include seasonal fruits and vegetables that are loaded with nutrients, such as apples, cabbage, carrots, cranberries, pears, sweet potatoes and winter squash.

  • Add a note of richness, flavor and texture to dishes with fiber and protein rich nuts.

If your restaurant is incorporating healthy foods into the menu, why not tell your customers about it? At On The Menu, we can help identify and analyze menu items that promote health. We specialize in recipe analysis and nutrition marketing for restaurants and can bring light to your fall harvest.

Denver boasts gluten-free restaurants

Thursday, September 20th, 2007

It’s thrilling for residents and visitors of Denver to have more and more gluten-free dining options available. According to our staff dietitian, Rebekah Spetnagel, MSS, RD, “The rise in people diagnosed with Celiac Disease and wheat intolerances has led to an increase demand for gluten-free foods.” Denver’s restaurants are starting to get the message as more establishments offer gluten-free menus.

People avoiding gluten love to dine out as much as anyone, but their choices tend to be limited, boring and sometimes hazardous. Often a restaurant’s staff is not educated on a gluten-free diet, leaving the job up to the customer. Imagine having to explain your diet every time you dine out? If the message doesn’t reach the kitchen staff or isn’t thoroughly understood, then dining out becomes a health risk. The experience can leave a bad taste in the mouth and a stomach ache to boot.

Gluten-free dining is a win-win for everyone. Gluten-free dining options create many happy guests. And happy guests are loyal customers.

We at On The Menu, LLC have a division of our company called the Gluten DetectivesÒ. We help restaurants solve the mystery of offering gluten-free foods. We investigate foods; tracking down suspect ingredients and running background checks to ensure a gluten-free outcome. We educate restaurant staff on the gluten-free diet and provide them with tips to prevent cross contact.

If you own or manage a restaurant and are interested in offering a gluten free menu we would love to talk with you. If you are avoiding gluten, may we suggest you try gluten-free foods offered at the following restaurants: Beau Jo’s, Blue Bonnet, Deby’s Gluten Free Bakery & Café, India’s Corner and Masalaa Denver. For more information on these restaurants please check out the Gluten DetectivesÒ.

Warning to restaurants: A gluten free menu has been linked to increased sales.

Correct Use of Nutrition Claims

Monday, September 10th, 2007

At On The Menu one of our specialty services is assisting our clients with FDA regulated nutrition claims. Determining which claims a food product qualifies to use is not as simple as you may think. Some claims, such as “sugar free,” may qualify only if a disclaimer is stated along with the claim. Due to an increase in improper use of the “sugar free” claim, the FDA’s director of the Office of Nutritional Products, Labeling, and Dietary Supplements has issued a warning letter addressing the concern. In this letter (below) you will see companies cautioned on the use of the claim and the need for a potential disclaimer. If you’re in question on how to use a claim, never rely on your competitors’ claims for accuracy. For more information on claims visit the FDA website or contact the food labeling experts at On The Menu.  

Attention: 

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is concerned about the number of products we have seen that contain claims regarding the absence of sugar, such as, “sugar free” but that fail to bear the required disclaimer statement when these foods are not “low” or “reduced in” calories or fail to bear the required disclaimer statement in the location or with the conspicuousness required by regulation.  As part of our continuing effort to reduce the incidence of obesity in the

United States, FDA wants to ensure that consumers are provided with the label information they need to make informed choices for maintaining a healthy diet. We are highlighting accurate claims about the absence of sugar as a regulatory priority.  The agency intends to take appropriate action against products that we encounter that bear a claim about the absence of sugar (e.g., sugar free) but that fail to meet each of the requirements of the regulation that defines “sugar free.”  We intend to pay particular attention to those foods that are required to bear a disclaimer statement under the regulation that defines “sugar free,” but that fail to do so or otherwise fail to comply with the regulation, 21 CFR 101.60(c).   Therefore, we are taking this opportunity to remind food manufacturers and distributors of conventional food products that the definition of “sugar free” includes several requirements. 

Under the authority of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990, FDA issued regulations for the nutrient content claim “sugar free” 58 Federal Register (FR) 2302 at 2415.  “Sugar free” is defined in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations 101.60(c) (21 CFR 101.60(c)) as a claim that may be used on a food that contains less than 0.5 g of sugars, as defined in § 101.9(c)(6)(ii), per reference amount customarily consumed and per labeled serving (21 CFR 101.60 (c)).  For a food that meets the definition of a “meal” in 21 CFR 101.13(l) or “main dish” in 21 CFR 101.13(m), the food must contain less than 0.5 g of sugars per labeled serving.  In addition, such foods may not contain any ingredient that is a sugar or that is generally understood by consumers to contain sugars, unless the listing of the ingredient in the ingredient statement is followed by an asterisk that refers to the statement that appears below the list of ingredients, and that provides: “adds a trivial amount of sugar,” “adds a negligible amount of sugar,” or “adds a dietarily insignificant amount of sugar.”  FDA has historically taken the position that consumers may associate claims regarding the absence of sugar with weight control and with foods that are low calorie or that have been altered to reduce calories significantly.  Therefore, the definition for “sugar free” includes the requirement that any food that is not low or reduced in calorie disclose that fact.  Without such information some consumers might think the food was offered for weight control.  See 56 FR 60421 at 60435.  Consequently, the definition for “sugar free” includes the requirement that the food be labeled with the claim “low calorie” or “reduced calorie” or bear a relative claim of special dietary usefulness labeled in compliance with 21 CFR 101.60(b)(2), (b)(3), (b)(4), or (b)(5) or such claim is immediately accompanied, each time it is used, by one of the following disclaimer statements: “not a reduced calorie food,” “not a low calorie food,” or “not for weight control” (see 21 CFR 101.60(c)(1)(iii)).  The disclaimer statement, when required, must accompany the claim each time it is used.  In addition, the disclaimer statement is subject to the requirements of 21 CFR 101.2(c) and must appear prominently and conspicuously but in no case may the letters be less than one-sixteenth inch in height. 

FDA encourages food manufacturers and distributors to review their labels and ensure that any food that bears a claim regarding the absence of sugar meet each of the requirements for that claim including the placement and conspicuousness of the disclaimer statement in 21 CFR 101.60(c)(1)(iii) when required.  FDA will take appropriate action, consistent with our priorities and resources, when we find problems with the use of nutrient content claims regarding the absence of sugar in foods. 

Sincerely, 

Barbara O. Schneeman, Ph.D.

Director, Office of Nutritional Products, Labeling, and Dietary Supplements Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition

Food and Drug Administration

Restaurant Menu Labeling

Thursday, September 6th, 2007

What does the future hold for restaurant menu labeling? The Center for Science in the Public Interest believes laws requiring chain restaurants to list calories on menu boards are just around the corner.

California is one of many states considering legislation to mandate menu labeling. Follow link for information on Menu Labeling Legislation Gaining Momentum In California

If you would like to determine the nutrition content of your menu items, contact the nutrition and labeling experts at On The Menu to get started.